On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the following arguments and carry out the instructions below.
-Arnold is fifty years old, one hundred pounds overweight, and eats a diet that includes lots of candy, ice cream, and cake. Helen, forty-six, is 108 pounds overweight, and eats a diet that includes lots of sweets. Arnold was just been diagnosed with clogged arteries. Therefore, Helen will probably get clogged arteries, too.
a. List several irrelevant dissimilarities that would have no bearing on the argument.
b. List several additional relevant similarities that would strengthen the argument.
c. Change the conclusion so that the argument is weaker.
d. Change the conclusion so that the argument is stronger.
e. Add a premise that makes the argument stronger.
f. Add a premise that makes the argument weaker.
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q272: An analogical argument is inductive in nature.
Q273: An IBE is inductive in nature.
Q274: A generalization from a sample is deductive
Q275: An enumerative induction is deductive in nature.
Q276: An analogy is a similarity between two
Q278: On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the
Q279: On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the
Q280: On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the
Q281: On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the
Q282: For each set of values, determine the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents