The argument that it is not possible to objectively measure costs and benefits for all people affected by an action is an argument against the ______________ theory of ethics.
A) Rights.
B) Justice.
C) Utilitarianism.
D) Egoism.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument against the possibility of objectively measuring costs and benefits for all people affected by an action is specifically an argument against Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that suggests an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce the reverse of happiness—not just for the performer of the action but for everyone affected by it. The challenge of objectively measuring happiness or utility for everyone is a well-known critique of this theory.

The Argument That It Is Not Possible to Objectively Measure