Critics of the critical-period hypothesis of language acquisition believe that rare cases,such as Genie,are not good evidence for the biological nature of language learning because

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Critics argue that Genie's case cannot be used as evidence for the critical-period hypothesis because she was severely deprived of human contact, which may have led to serious cognitive, physiological, and psychological deficits that would impact her ability to acquire language. Her case is seen as an extreme outlier, and it is unlikely that most children experience such extreme deprivation or isolation. Therefore, her case does not provide convincing evidence for the biological basis of language acquisition.

Critics of the Critical-Period Hypothesis of Language Acquisition Believe That