Hakuta and Bialystok (2001) argued against the concept of a critical period for second-language (L2) acquisition. They argued that:
A) even though earlier immigrants show greater L2 proficiency, there was a sharp break at 15 years of age
B) younger and older learners differ in cognitive development, and perhaps in the cognitive strategies they use in L2 learning
C) the sheer amount of practice that adults receive in L2 is far greater than that received by children
D) adults' fears and attitudes about second language learning strongly affects their L2 acquisition

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Hakuta and Bialystok argued that younger and older learners differ in cognitive development and may use different cognitive strategies in L2 learning. They did not find evidence for a critical period for L2 acquisition.

Hakuta and Bialystok (2001) Argued Against the Concept of a Critical