Kyle was eating clam chowder soup in a restaurant when a very small piece of bone lodged in his throat.Fortunately,he was able to remove the bone with his fingers.However,he was upset by the incident and sued the restaurant for negligence.The most likely result would be:
A) Kyle will not collect any damages since he did not sustain any damages.
B) Kyle will collect damages as bones in chowder are common.
C) Kyle will collect damages if he proves it was possible to prevent tiny fish bones from being present in clam chowder.
D) Kyle will collect damages, as res ipsa loquitur applies.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Negligence concerns harm that
A)is unforeseeable.
B)arises intentionally.
C)arises by
Q30: Which of the following acts resulting in
Q31: The test of "foreseeability" is generally used
Q32: Phillip was waiting for a bus at
Q33: Laura,a brain surgeon,committed a negligent act when
Q34: Kelley went ice skating on a neighbor's
Q36: The Supreme Court of California in Wiener
Q37: In Hernandez v.Arizona Board of Regents,the court
Q37: If a court applies res ipsa loquitur
A)the
Q38: Punitive damages are awarded:
A) for past and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents