The Collision Hypothesis and Evolutionary Theories are considered to be equally plausible explanations of how planetary systems form.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Collision Hypothesis and Evolutionary Theories are not considered equally plausible explanations of how planetary systems form. The current scientific consensus and evidence support the view that planetary systems form through the process of accretion, which is part of the larger process of star and planet formation called the nebular hypothesis. The Collision Hypothesis posits that planetary systems are formed from the collision of stars, while Evolutionary Theories offer various mechanisms for how planets might form from a protoplanetary disk. However, neither of these hypotheses is supported by the current scientific evidence.

The Collision Hypothesis and Evolutionary Theories Are Considered to Be