In a famous study, Bechara and colleagues (1996) had participants play a card game where they selected cards that were assigned different values. They rigged decks of cards so that two decks were overall beneficial (selecting cards from them would result in more gains than losses) , and two were disadvantageous (selecting cards from them would result in relatively more losses) What did this study demonstrate?
A) Participants who learned to tell the difference between the good and bad decks more quickly had greater overall psychological well-being, suggesting the importance of this general ability
B) Participants' physiological reactions were tracking the value of the decks before participants were consciously able to indicate which decks were good and bad.
C) Participants could explicitly name the good and bad decks before they had differing physiological responses to them, suggesting high-level cognition controls emotional responding
D) Participants' physiological activity never correlated with their explicit knowledge of good and bad decks, suggesting an inherent dissocation between explicit knowledge and emotion responding
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Lerner and Keltner (2001) observed effects of
Q9: Which type of appraisal from appraisa theory
Q10: People can evaluate the persuasiveness of an
Q11: According to the so-called ""hedonic"" view of
Q12: Damasio (1994) proposed that each alternative in
Q14: Research on aging suggests that during late
Q15: Based on the findings of Halberstadt and
Q16: What is the term that describes the
Q17: What do associative network models and embodied
Q18: Which statement about associative network models is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents