In the Late 1930s,with the ALCOA Case,the Courts Changed Their

In the late 1930s,with the ALCOA case,the courts changed their former interpretation of antitrust laws to

A) reflect the rule of reason.
B) allow all but overt monopoly pricing behavior by a firm.
C) focus primarily on a firm's share of the market rather than its market conduct.
D) find that only those firms that behaved collusively were violating the antitrust laws.
E) reiterate that mere size was not an offense.