One reason for rejecting the argument that inequality of income lessens total consumer satisfaction (because an extra dollar given to a poor man provides him with more extra satisfaction than the loss of a dollar taken away from a rich man) is that
A) the rich and the poor have the same capacity to gain enjoyment from income.
B) interpersonal comparisons of satisfaction do not rest on scientific grounds.
C) poor people spend their incomes on consumption, whereas the rich invest theirs in capital.
D) arguments based on considerations of positive economics cannot be used to make ethical judgments.
E) the rich are more deserving than the poor.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: A tax that takes a smaller proportion
Q11: A sales tax is generally considered to
Q12: Which of the following regions would be
Q13: Those who argue against income inequality say
Q14: Which of the following countries had the
Q16: Sales taxes are typically considered to be
A)
Q17: A tax structure under which an individual
Q18: The argument that total consumer enjoyment from
Q19: It is difficult to tell whether the
Q20: In 2012,the top 5 percent of U.S.households
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents