Your advisor conducted a study on decision making using a 2 (mood prime: negative, positive) x 2 (physiological arousal: adrenaline injection, saline solution injection) factorial design, and had a final sample of 80 participants. However, upon further investigation, you realized that half of participants, randomly chosen, were administered a questionnaire about their attitudes toward authority figures before the primary dependent measure, and half completed the attitudinal questionnaire after the primary dependent measure. What sort of design would this most likely be? In this example, is it possible to obtain a significant three-way interaction, even if there are no significant main effects or two-way interactions? Do you have sufficient power to obtain a significant three-way interaction? How reliable would you expect the results of a three-way interaction test to be? Is it ever appropriate to divide participants into additional groups or categories after all data have been collected - why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q10: Researchers wanted to investigate the efficacy of
Q11: It is possible to have an interaction
Q12: Provide an example for a 2 x
Q13: Researchers were interested in the efficacy of
Q14: Given two variables, Variable A and Variable
Q15: Draw a graph representing a Solomon four-groups
Q16: Though the Solomon four-group design may have
Q17: Is it possible to have an interaction
Q19: The theory of psychological reactance (Brehm, 1966;
Q20: Using a modified pretest-posttest control group design,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents