In NFIB v. Sebelius (2012) the United States Supreme court ruled that
A) The federal government had the authority to withdraw federal funds from the original Medicaid program if states refused to expand their Medicaid program
B) Requiring states to expand their Medicaid program was unconstitutional and states could voluntarily join or to opt out of the expansion without fear of losing federal matching funds for the original Medicaid program
C) The Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional
D) The federal government must provide states with additional funds to expand their Medicaid program
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: In order to participate in Medicaid, the
Q9: The Affordable Care Act of 2010 established
Q10: Those individuals who are qualify for both
Q11: States' share of Medicaid expenditures (state financing)
Q12: Under the CHIP program, states were given
Q14: When it came to Medicaid expansion and
Q15: Factors that help explain states decision to
Q16: Reason cited by states for expanding their
Q17: States that expanded their Medicaid program under
Q18: Argument against Medicaid expansion under the ACA
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents