"Beauty" in Astronomy: In the absence of observational evidence, scientists often rely on other considerations to make decisions. One such consideration that we have met before (Chapter 3) is Occam's razor: the simplest explanation is to be preferred. Another consideration that is often used (and sometimes championed) by astronomers is the perceived "beauty" of the ideas themselves. Imagine you lived at a time before observational tests could be brought to bear on which of the ultimate fates (re-collapsing, critical, coasting, or accelerating) applies to our Universe. Which fate you would support based on your own personal idea of "beauty"? Give your arguments, even if you think they are not scientific. Did you choose the observationally supported theory (you may need to skip ahead to Chapter 17)? What do you think of the role such considerations play in science? Are they sometimes necessary?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q32: MACHOs are expected to be found only
Q34: What might be causing the universe to
Q36: If all the "dark matter" in our
Q38: What fraction of the mass needed to
Q39: MACHOs (massive compact halo objects) have been
Q41: The enclosed mass M(<r) represents ALL of
Q75: Explain how observations of white-dwarf supernovae provide
Q102: One possible ingredient of dark matter is
Q104: The visible parts of galaxies contribute about
Q113: Dark matter in galaxies and clusters of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents