Virginia v. Black (2003; involved cross-burning by Ku Klux Klan and others in Virginia) held that it is:
A) unconstitutional to enhance hate crime sentences without a jury finding guilt beyond reasonable doubt
B) unconstitutional to criminally sanction hate-expressions that do not imminently incite violence
C) constitutional to criminalize cross-burning because it is inextricably intertwined with a racist history
D) constitutional to enhance the punishment of a crime motivated by prejudice or hatred
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
Q24: Defamation is a type of communication/media NOT
Q25: In the USA, hateful and bigoted speech
Q26: In Rankin v. McPherson (1987, clerk was
Q27: Can urban and public affairs officials regulate
Q29: The 4th Amendment requires a warrant for
Q30: When you "take the Fifth" in a
Q31: How many Amendments are found in the
Q32: The Founders conceived of Congress as "congressus,"
Q33: For what reason(s) may the President be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents