The case of a profoundly retarded man who was kept in restraints in a Pennsylvania state hospital because he kept injuring himself was ______.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This landmark case established the rights of involuntarily committed individuals with mental disabilities to receive adequate care and treatment, while also limiting the government's liability in cases where professionals make reasonable decisions based on available information. The case involved a man with intellectual disabilities who was placed in restraints and subjected to other forms of physical control to prevent him from harming himself. The Supreme Court ruled that the hospital staff had not violated his constitutional rights, as they had acted in good faith and in the best interests of the patient. The case set a precedent for balancing the right to humane treatment and protection from harm with the need for reasonable measures to ensure safety in institutional settings.

The Case of a Profoundly Retarded Man Who Was Kept