According to John Marshall's decision in McCulloch v.Maryland (1819) ,the elastic clause might be interpreted to mean that Congress can take a particular action not specified in the Constitution if that action is
A) approved by both houses of Congress.
B) strictly related to accomplishment of a national priority.
C) requested by a state government.
D) generally in the public interest.
E) plainly adapted to achieving a legitimate constitutional end.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: "Let the end be legitimate,let it be
Q26: While always a part of the federal
Q27: The use of highway construction funds has
Q28: Which of the following is not a
Q29: In recent years,the Supreme Court has denied
Q31: Formula grants and project grants are both
Q32: A central question in the McCulloch case
Q33: Suppose Congress funds elementary education by giving
Q34: In McCulloch v.Maryland,Chief Justice Marshall employed the
Q35: From the 1930s to the mid-1990s,
A)the Supreme
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents