How did congress react to the Supreme Court's ruling in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)?
a) Congress overturned the decision in CRA-91, stating that a requirement of a motivating factor, not a substantial factor, was necessary.
b) Remedies were also bifurcated. Judgment Plaintiff: entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relieve, and attorney's fees. Judgment Defendant: Avoids paying damages, needing to reinstate, hiring, promote, or pay.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: What were the burdens for plaintiffs and
Q2: What major change was made to the
Q3: How do burdens in mixed motive differ
Q5: How was the plaintiff's burden in mixed-motive
Q6: How do the burdens in pattern or
Q7: What are the traditional indicators of pattern
Q8: What are some of the newer issues
Q9: What are the characteristics of successful and
Q10: What are the major implications of bona
Q11: What variations in adverse impact theory existed
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents