What is the Supreme Court's justification for saying that the Fourth Amendment does not require police to obtain a warrant to search automobiles when they have probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains contraband or evidence of criminal activity?
A) Because a warrant is never required for any movable object such as a vehicle.
B) By the time the officers could obtain the warrant, the suspects could have driven away and destroyed any evidence
C) Because there is no right to privacy in a vehicle that may be operated on a public roads.
D) Because warrants are only required for personal property such as homes, apartments, or garages.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Officers may conduct a warrantless arrest in
Q14: Police officers must not just have probable
Q15: The standard that the Supreme Court uses
Q16: The Supreme Court has held that if
Q17: In order to stop a person an
Q19: Any physical or verbal evidence police are
Q20: When someone is under arrest what is
Q21: In which of the following situations is
Q22: Routine booking questions, such as the suspect's
Q23: Taking a person into custody who is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents