Supreme Court rulings that exclude evidence for violations of the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures:
A) require that all evidence illegally seized always be suppressed.
B) do not require that evidence should be suppressed if the prosecutor wants to use it.
C) are not applied when the police violate the knock-and-announce requirement of the Fourth Amendment, as a general rule.
D) are always applied when the knock-and-announce requirement of the Fourth Amendment is violated.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: The defendant in the case of Georgia
Q29: In the case of Horton v. California,
Q30: The rationale for excluding evidence obtained in
Q31: Additional support for excluding evidence seized in
Q32: The rule of law that prohibits the
Q34: When evidence has been illegally obtained in
Q35: The Fourth Amendment to the United States
Q36: When a search is made incident to
Q37: When an officer saw a woman driving
Q38: A suspect may waive his or her
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents