In the United States V

In the United States v. Jones, where federal law enforcement officials attached global positioning satellite tracking system to his automobile without a valid warrant:

A) there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment because no one has an expectation of privacy in the undercarriage of his or her automobile.
B) there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment since the officers possessed an expired warrant, so the attachment of the global positioning satellite tracking system did not constitute a violation of the defendant's expectation of privacy.
C) the evidence obtained by virtue of the global positioning satellite tracking system should be admissible against the defendant, Mr. Jones, because a police officer could have observed Mr. Jones at every location where he appeared during the duration of the global satellite positioning system.
D) resulted in a determination by the Supreme Court of the United States that a global positioning satellite tracking system and its usage on a private automobile required the presence of a warrant that was valid, and that evidence collected without a warrant should be excluded.