In the City of Cleveland Heights v. Katz, a police officer observed a vehicle traveling at an elevated level of speed and clocked the vehicle with a radar unit. A municipal court convicted Katz of speeding and he appealed, contending that the radar gun and the instruments used to calibrate the radar gun had not been shown to have been properly tested. What steps must a police officer take to accurately clock a potential speeder with scientific instruments? What steps can a police department be forced to follow in order to prove that an instrument worked properly? Was the radar device properly maintained and serviced? Would you have overturned the conviction? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q11: What is the principle behind laser speed
Q12: Has any court approved the use of
Q13: Describe the deoxyribonucleic acid
Q14: What are the reasons and rationales that
Q15: In People v. Wilkinson, the defendant wanted
Q17: In the case of Commonwealth v. Gaynor,
Q18: Evidence that is the result of examinations
Q19: The courts have established rules concerning the
Q20: In considering the admissibility of testimony relating
Q21: In considering the use of results of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents