In the Supreme Court Case Maryland V

In the Supreme Court case Maryland v. King (2013) , involving the collection of DNA from arrestees:

A) the high court ruled that taking a sample from a felony arrestee for inclusion in a national database did not offend the Constitution and would produce evidence that could be admissible against the donor.
B) the high court ruled that such evidence taken from a donor could be used for inclusion within the database for identification purposes but was not admissible in evidence at criminal trials.
C) the Supreme Court of the United States determined that warrants were required for individuals in custody before a DNA sample could be obtained.
D) police are permitted to restrain an individual against his will and draw blood for a DNA sample even without a warrant.