For an item of evidence to be authenticated using the chain of custody theory:
A) the prosecution must generally account for the location and control of the item from the time it was secured at a crime scene until it is introduced in court as evidence.
B) even minor gaps in the chain of custody will virtually always result in the item of evidence being excluded from the criminal trial.
C) the item of evidence must have a serial number introduced in court that will demonstrate that the item of evidence is the same one found at the crime scene.
D) must be proof that the evidence never left the police property room for any reason until the day of trial, when the item of evidence was introduced.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: In the case of State v. Griffin,
Q18: In the case of Underwood v. State,
Q19: In McHenry v. State of Indiana, the
Q20: "Evidence furnished by things themselves, upon a
Q21: The case of Schmerber v. California involved
Q23: One method of authenticating an item of
Q24: In applying the Federal Rule 901 (Requirement
Q25: Police arrested a juvenile following a drive-by
Q26: When, in a criminal case, the defendant
Q27: Generally, devices and instruments used in the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents