In considering the results of blood, urine, and breath tests to determine intoxication, the courts-including the United States Supreme Court-have generally concluded that:
A) the use of blood is an approved method; however, the use of urine is not reliable and therefore not approved.
B) the administration of such tests by a medical doctor, chemist, or medical technician without a warning violates self-incrimination rights.
C) the extraction of blood samples for such tests does not violate self-incrimination or right-to-counsel protections.
D) these tests may be made by any public official because the due process question is not at issue.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: Photographs are frequently offered in evidence to
Q33: Some photographs are gruesome. The general rule
Q34: Motion pictures are:
A) never allowed in evidence,
Q35: Videotape recordings containing sound:
A) are not admissible
Q36: Before a sound recording is admitted into
Q37: Permission for a witness to explain his
Q38: The United States Supreme Court, as well
Q40: In considering the admissibility of DNA evidence
Q41: In the case of Underwood v. State,
Q42: In attempting to have her embezzlement conviction
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents