When considering the admissibility of documentary evidence:
A) it is apparent that there is no difference between documentary and real evidence.
B) one must be aware that documentary evidence does not carry as much weight as oral testimony.
C) it is fundamental that documentary evidence meet the same general requirements as to relevancy, competency, and materiality as oral testimony.
D) one is reminded that the courts have held that the hearsay rule does not apply in the case of documentary evidence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: What is the basis for the rule
Q13: In the case of Wilkerson v. State,
Q14: In State v. Palermo, the defendant contended
Q15: In McKeehan v. State, defendant McKeehan was
Q16: Examples of documentary evidence that must be
Q18: Documentary evidence is not admissible until it
Q19: A handwritten document must be authenticated before
Q20: Courts and legislative bodies have generally agreed
Q21: In order for a document to be
Q22: In some instances, authenticity is taken as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents