In McAfee v. State, the defendant was accused of murdering his wife and then speaking on the phone with a man who was an attorney for the defendant with respect to civil matters. The attorney was concerned that the defendant might take his own life and counseled him in ways that would likely prevent suicide. The attorney admitted that he never represented the defendant in any criminal matter. The trial court ruled that there was no attorney-client privilege concerning the discussions that the attorney had with the defendant during the course of the evening that he was arrested for murder of his wife. Why did the reviewing court think that the trial court ruled properly in rejecting the existence of an attorney-client privilege?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q14: What is the policy basis of the
Q15: What is the present status of the
Q16: What is meant by the term shield
Q17: In Trammel v. United States, the defendant
Q18: In St. Clair v. Commonwealth, the defendant
Q20: In State v. Bergmann, the defendant was
Q21: A privilege that prohibits evidence of some
Q22: Some testimony, even though relevant, is not
Q23: Traditionally, the courts in most states recognized
Q24: The marital testimonial privilege has developed over
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents