In considering the duration of the marital testimonial privilege, the courts have generally agreed that:
A) utterances made in confidence subsequent to the divorce of the parties are nevertheless protected by the privilege.
B) when the spouses are divorced at the time of the trial, the purposes of the marital testimonial privilege no longer apply.
C) when the courts consider the marital testimonial privilege and its duration, it makes little difference whether the parties are divorced or separated.
D) if the previous spouses continue to live with each other after the divorce, the marital testimonial privilege continues to exist as if they were still married.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: A privilege that prohibits evidence of some
Q22: Some testimony, even though relevant, is not
Q23: Traditionally, the courts in most states recognized
Q24: The marital testimonial privilege has developed over
Q25: An exception to the marital confidential communication
Q27: The case of Trammel v. United States,
Q28: In a state that did not recognize
Q29: The principle of the attorney-client privilege:
A) is
Q30: The attorney-client privilege covers confidential communications that
Q31: The privilege against disclosure of information confidentially
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents