As a general rule, when refreshing memory by use of a prior writing:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The prior writing used to refresh memory is not necessarily admissible as evidence, but it should be made available to the opposing counsel. A and B are incorrect because the writing itself is not evidence, and it does not necessarily have to be made at the exact moment the words were uttered. C is incorrect because the prior writing can come from any source, as long as it helps the witness refresh their memory.

As a General Rule, When Refreshing Memory by Use of a Prior