When an effort is made to impeach a witness by introducing evidence of prior inconsistent statements:
A) such statements are admissible as substantive evidence to show that the witness committed the crime.
B) the witness must be afforded an opportunity to explain inconsistencies.
C) such statements are not authorized by the prosecution because this only confuses the jury.
D) the statements are admissible, and the defendant need not be given the opportunity to explain inconsistencies.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: After a witness has been cross-examined, the
Q41: Impeachment, as it relates to the witnesses
Q42: The government in a criminal case may:
A)
Q43: One way to impeach a witness is
Q44: According to Rule 608 of the Federal
Q45: When an effort is made to impeach
Q47: An extrajudicial confession by the defendant may
Q48: In State v. Fry, the female defendant
Q49: In People v. Melendez, the trial judge
Q50: In State v. Sands, the trial judge
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents