In order to authenticate a caller on a telephone sufficiently to make the conversation competent as evidence:
A) proof that the call came from a designated caller based on caller ID alone should be sufficient to allow the substance of the conversation to be introduced into evidence as having come from the person identified on the caller ID.
B) the person who received the call and who could identify the voice of the caller along with proof of the caller ID, should allow the substance of the conversation to be introduced into evidence.
C) so long as the caller identified himself or herself as being the particular person, whether or not the recipient of the call recognized the voice, such self-identification should be sufficient to make the evidence considered competent as evidence.
D) all of the above indicate that the conversation evidence should be considered competent and admissible into evidence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Incompetent evidence that might be excluded by
Q25: Evidence that is considered incompetent for one
Q26: In considering the competency of evidence, documentary
Q27: Evidence showing the outcome of a scientific
Q28: Because telephone conversation evidence must be authenticated
Q30: Where an issue has been raised concerning
Q31: The modern tendency regarding the competency of
Q32: In determining the competency of a child
Q33: Under the common law rule, a husband
Q34: If a witness has been convicted of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents