Is evidence of conduct of the accused shortly before the offense, which is either consistent with innocence or consistent with a defendant's guilt, considered relevant and admissible? If so, what are the limitations concerning the admissibility of such evidence?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Is evidence of conduct of the accused shortly before the offense, which is either consistent with innocence or consistent with a defendant's guilt, considered relevant and admissible? If so, what are the limitations concerning the admissibility of such evidence?

Is Evidence of Conduct of the Accused Shortly Before the Offense