When a judge has taken judicial notice of a fact:
A) the opposing counsel can still introduce evidence that tends to disprove the fact judicially noticed.
B) the judge will generally prevent any party from introducing evidence that tends to dispute the fact judicially noticed.
C) the jury must accept as fact any fact that has been the proper subject of judicial notice and cannot decide the case in a manner that shows that it disregarded the fact noticed.
D) the fact is taken as established even when an appellate court later disagrees with the propriety of taking judicial notice.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: In some instances, the judge may take
Q32: If an issue involving a state statute
Q33: Within the United States, state and federal
Q34: States that have adopted the Uniform Judicial
Q35: Judicial notice may be taken of municipal
Q37: In regard to judicial notice of jurisdiction
Q38: When both parties reach an agreement concerning
Q39: The difference between a presumption and an
Q40: There are several reasons or explanations for
Q41: One commonly stated presumption approved by courts
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents