In some cases, courts have given the instruction that possession by the defendant of recently stolen property raises an inference of guilty knowledge of the theft. Recent cases indicate that:
A) this type of instruction is generally considered to be grounds for error and the case will be reversed.
B) such instructions are generally approved if the possession is unexplained and the possession is fairly recent, even though it may seem to appear that the defendant is being forced to prove his innocence.
C) all states now reject the "recent possession and the presumption arising therefrom" doctrine since there are probably numerous explanations that are not consistent with the presumption.
D) this instruction establishes a conclusive presumption and cannot be rebutted.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: The difference between a presumption and an
Q40: There are several reasons or explanations for
Q41: One commonly stated presumption approved by courts
Q42: Presumptions have been classified as presumptions of
Q43: A presumption of fact:
A) may usually be
Q45: In criminal cases, when there is evidence
Q46: In the case of Commonwealth v. Howlett,
Q47: In the case of State v. Odom,
Q48: In the case of State v. Smith,
Q49: In the case of Williams v. State,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents