In the case of Maddox v. Montgomery, the defendant had been convicted of rape. He appealed and alleged that the prosecution had withheld material evidence from the defense. He filed a habeas corpus petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The court interpreted the Brady doctrine as it applied to his case. The Brady doctrine deals with the prosecution withholding evidence favorable to the defense. In that case, the court enumerated situations in which the Brady doctrine applies. The court decided that:
A) in order to prevail on a claim under the Brady doctrine, it is only necessary for the defense to show that the prosecution suppressed evidence that was favorable to the defendant.
B) the only situation in which the Brady doctrine applies is where the prosecutor had not disclosed information despite a specific defense request.
C) the defendant's due process rights are violated where the prosecution suppressed evidence even though the evidence was not material.
D) in order to prevail on a claim under the Brady doctrine, it must be established that the prosecution suppressed evidence that was favorable to the defendant and the defendant must establish that the exculpatory information was material and that it was suppressed by the prosecution.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: The primary purpose of a witnesses who
Q44: In a criminal case, the jury:
A) determines
Q45: In most jurisdictions, the decision as to
Q46: In a criminal case, the defense attorney:
A)
Q47: In 1985, the Supreme Court of the
Q48: The Supreme Court of the United States
Q49: Direct evidence can be very crucial in
Q50: In considering the weight of circumstantial evidence
Q52: In a criminal case, Brown v. State,
Q53: In a criminal case, State v. Jordan,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents