In the case of State v. Eichelberger, the defendant had been convicted of two counts of trafficking in stolen property in the second degree because it believed that Eichelberger sold property that he should have known had been stolen. Under the circumstances of this case, why did the reviewing court determine that a reasonable jury could have found that the evidence was sufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In the case of State v. Eichelberger, the defendant had been convicted of two counts of trafficking in stolen property in the second degree because it believed that Eichelberger sold property that he should have known had been stolen. Under the circumstances of this case, why did the reviewing court determine that a reasonable jury could have found that the evidence was sufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

In the Case of State V