In federal courts when a defendant pleads insanity:
A) the burden of introducing evidence to prove insanity rests with the defendant.
B) to prevail in the case, the defendant must meet the affirmative burden of clear and convincing evidence.
C) the prosecution must prove sanity beyond a reasonable doubt in order to win the case.
D) answers a and b both state correct responses.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: If "specific intent" is an element of
Q34: If the defendant in a criminal case
Q35: The law regarding the alibi defense differs
Q36: In regard to the mental element (insanity)
Q37: In 1984, as a part of the
Q38: In a homicide case, if the accused
Q40: In the case of In re Winship,
Q41: In the case of Lindsey v. Commonwealth,
Q42: In State v. Eichelberger, the defendant was
Q43: In the case of Martin v. Ohio,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents