In the case of Funk v. United States, which considers the traditional rule prohibiting a wife from testifying for or against her husband in a criminal case, the court discussed the development of the rules of evidence. There the court found that:
A) rules of evidence, once established, cannot be changed by court decision.
B) the common law relating to the rules of evidence is not immutable, but is flexible and may be adapted to varying conditions.
C) common law rules of evidence that developed under the English system must be followed in the United States.
D) the court must continue to enforce the traditional rule, which prohibits a wife from testifying for her husband in a criminal case.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Two legal systems have developed and are
Q23: Following the Norman Conquest in England, jurors
Q24: The rules of evidence that have been
Q25: In an effort to obtain more uniformity
Q26: Since July 1973, the Federal Rules of
Q27: Demonstrative of the evolutionary development of the
Q29: Evidence that requires inferences to be made
Q30: Documentary evidence would include which of the
Q31: Prima facie evidence is defined as:
A) the
Q32: Evidence that qualifies as hearsay evidence is:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents