Which third-party intervention is commonly used in national emergency disputes?
A) fact finding
B) mediation
C) binding arbitration
D) non-binding arbitration

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In national emergency disputes, where time is of the essence, fact-finding is commonly used. It is a quick and efficient process that helps the parties to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Fact-finding involves a neutral third-party who investigates and provides the parties with a report that outlines the facts surrounding the dispute. Once the report is issued, the parties may use it as a basis for negotiation or further dispute resolution. Mediation is also commonly used, but it involves a longer process and may not be suitable in emergency disputes where immediate action is needed. Binding arbitration may not be suitable as it leaves the decision-making power in the hands of an arbitrator rather than the parties themselves. Non-binding arbitration may be used but it does not have the same enforceability as fact-finding.

Which Third-Party Intervention Is Commonly Used in National Emergency Disputes