Under the United States Supreme Court's "doctrine of equivalents," infringers may not avoid liability for patent infringement by substituting insubstantial differences for some of the elements of the patented product or process.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement accurately describes the doctrine of equivalents, which is a legal principle used to determine if a product or process is infringing on a patent even if it does not use all of the exact same elements as the patented invention. If an accused item or process performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result, it may be found to infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.

Under the United States Supreme Court's "Doctrine of Equivalents," Infringers