Louise owned a house next to Robert's house. Robert made a contract with Midcity Painters to paint his house. The painters arrived to paint Robert's house, but mistakenly painted Louise's house. She saw the painters at work and made no comment. Later, Midcity Painters sent Louise a bill for painting her house. She claimed that she was not liable because she had not made any contract with them. Is this a valid defense?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q36: Negotiable instruments are:
A) formal contracts.
B) informal contracts.
C)
Q37: Quasi contracts are fictional contracts.
Q38: Quasi-contractual liability will generally be imposed when
Q39: The elements for a valid contract do
Q40: An implied contract is shown by:
A) a
Q42: The main thrust of the quasi contract
Q43: An obligation to pay for the reasonable
Q44: The plaintiff in a quasi-contractual action can
Q45: A right of _ refusal is the
Q46: A bilateral contract consists of a:
A) promise
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents