Janet Durham orally agreed to purchase certain computer hardware priced at $10,000 from Ted Stallings. The sale of the hardware also included a one-time setup service visit priced at $100. The total contract price amounted to $10,100. The computer hardware was delivered and set up, and Durham paid $10,100. Afterwards, Durham discovered that she could obtain the same goods and services from another seller for a total contract price of $9,100. She now seeks rescission of the contract, based on the fact that more than $500 in goods were involved in the sales transaction, that the contract between her and Stallings was subject to the statute of frauds as a result, and that the oral agreement between them was therefore unenforceable. Durham wants to return the computer hardware to Stallings, and receive reimbursement of $10,000 (She is willing to waive her claim to reimbursement for the $100 setup service visit.) Evaluate Durham's legal position in this matter.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q43: Consumer leases:
A) must always be evidenced by
Q44: A sales contract must be evidenced by
Q45: Newlog, which had developed a new process
Q46: All of the following satisfy the Statute
Q47: An agreement to periodically deliver home-heating oil
Q48: Which of the following situations create(s) an
Q50: A sales agreement that does not satisfy
Q51: _ represents a pattern of performance between
Q52: Gonzalez Manufacturing negotiated by telephone to purchase
Q53: An agreement to modify a contract for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents