Pamela was the agent in charge of distribution and collections for the Coble Dairy Products Cooperative. Thrower operated a grocery store and purchased dairy products from Coble. Pamela made false invoice sheets, showing delivery to Thrower of greater quantities than Thrower actually had ordered or received. Pamela collected from Thrower on the basis of these increased amounts, and then kept for herself the difference between the increased amounts and the amounts that should have been charged. When Thrower learned of this, he sued Coble for the excess payments he had made. Coble denied that Pamela was its agent in making excess collections. Will Thrower win?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q37: In general, a principal is liable for
Q38: When a fact is known to the
Q39: When an agent who lacks a principal's
Q40: A customer who has given a purchase
Q41: Payment to an authorized agent is:
A) payment
Q43: A principal is liable for the crimes
Q44: The employer of a salesperson:
A) is only
Q45: When a business owner uses an independent
Q46: Apparent authority has the same effect as:
A)
Q47: The concept of imposing liability for the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents