In advocating the proposition "equipping cars with anti-lock brakes does not reduce accidents," an argument claiming "drivers with ABS-equipped cars drive faster and follow closer than drivers without ABS" would constitute
A) an effect argument.
B) an inherency argument.
C) a significance argument.
D) a pre-emptive argument.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: In developing arguments to advocate and oppose
Q25: What purpose do the stock issues for
Q26: In preparing a prima facie case for
Q27: As an advocate for a proposition of
Q28: In factual argumentation, arguments about focus on
Q30: In arguing factual propositions, arguments concerning inherency
A)need
Q31: In opposing the proposition "equipping cars with
Q32: The opponents first strategic decision is to
A)determine
Q33: In preparing to oppose a factual proposition,
Q34: In factual argumentation, presumption
A)resides with the advocate
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents