In using extenuation arguments to refute the advocate's case, the opponent argues
A)that the relationship inferred by the advocate is based on a limited understanding of the circumstances.
B)that a more complete understanding of the circumstances leads to a different inference.
C)that unusual circumstances warrant a conclusion of than the one normally drawn when these facts are present.
D)All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Extenuation arguments are used to challenge an advocate's argument by presenting circumstances that could lead to a different inference than the one presented by the advocate. These circumstances may include limited understanding, a more complete understanding, or unusual circumstances. Therefore, all of the options listed are valid ways to use extenuation arguments.

In Using Extenuation Arguments to Refute the Advocate's Case, the Opponent