As an opponent in value argumentation, you have the strategic option of challenging the advocate's criteria. In using this strategy, which of the following could you NOT do?
A) Challenge the advocate's definition of the value object as either including elements she failed to consider, or excluding elements that she erroneously included.
B) Challenge the appropriateness of the advocate's criteria as "good" measures of effect, significance, and inherency.
C) Challenge the appropriateness of the advocate's criteria on the basis that they are too unusual or that they are more appropriate for measuring some other value object.
D) Provide better, more appropriate, criteria for measuring the value object.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: In resolving the conflict between values framed
Q31: As an advocate, you may attempt to
Q32: In establishing a prima facie position on
Q33: Assuming that one of our criteria for
Q34: Of course we would have to prove
Q35: In order to complete our argumentation about
Q36: In value argumentation, what does the inherency
Q37: As an opponent in value argumentation, to
Q38: In responding to the advocate's prima facie
Q40: As an opponent in value argumentation, you
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents