The subsidiary effects of the advocate's proposal constitute a warrant for change, and their absence renders the advocate's case non-prima facie.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: In arguing the "reason for change" in
Q6: The only value claim an advocate of
Q7: In policy argumentation, part of the advocate's
Q8: In policy argumentation, the advocate's policy proposal
Q9: "Solvency" refers to the ability of a
Q11: A counterproposal must be non-topical and preclude
Q12: A comparative advantage case is a strategy
Q13: One option for case development for advocating
Q14: In arguing against propositions of policy, it
Q15: The advocate has the option of suggesting
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents