Delis and colleagues (1986)used not only letter stimuli with their patients but also nonlinguistic hierarchical shape stimuli such as the example here.How did the results differ from those obtained with hierarchical letter stimuli?

A)The results were the same regardless of whether letter stimuli or shape stimuli were used.
B)Neither patient group showed any local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters.
C)Neither patient group showed any global impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters.
D)Neither patient group showed global or local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters.

Question

Delis and colleagues (1986)used not only letter stimuli with their patients but also nonlinguistic hierarchical shape stimuli such as the example here.How did the results differ from those obtained with hierarchical letter stimuli?

A)The results were the same regardless of whether letter stimuli or shape stimuli were used. 
B)Neither patient group showed any local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters. 
C)Neither patient group showed any global impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters. 
D)Neither patient group showed global or local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Delis and colleagues (1986)used not only letter stimuli with their patients but also nonlinguistic hierarchical shape stimuli such as the example here.How did the results differ from those obtained with hierarchical letter stimuli?

A)The results were the same regardless of whether letter stimuli or shape stimuli were used. 
B)Neither patient group showed any local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters. 
C)Neither patient group showed any global impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters. 
D)Neither patient group showed global or local impairments when shape stimuli were used instead of letters.

Delis and Colleagues (1986)used Not Only Letter Stimuli with Their