In the Jones v. Archibald focus case, All-Pro represented Nate Archibald (a professional athlete) in contract negotiations and financial management. Plaintiff Jones contacted Nate Archibald to make a one-day appearance at Jones' boys' camp and was told by Archibald to contact his agent, All-Pro. All-Pro informed plaintiff that Archibald would appear at the camp on August 15, 1973. On August 9, Archibald notified All-Pro that circumstances prevented him from making the appearance. What type of agency is represented in the above scenario?
A) Partially disclosed
B) Undisclosed
C) Disclosed
D) None of the above
E) All of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The Uniform Athlete Agents Act (UAAA) mandates
Q2: A fiduciary is defined as someone who
Q4: Clark Advertising Agency (Clark) sued the American
Q5: Which of the following describes the Uniform
Q6: The duties owed by an agent to
Q7: A relationship between two parties in which
Q8: Which of the following groups regulate sports
Q9: An agency relationship can be established by
Q10: Ratification may create an agency relationship where
Q11: The Uniform Athlete Agents Act (UAAA) permits
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents