Assume the Supreme Court of Washington State has made the following decisions:
a. 1984: No discrimination against yellows
b. 1989: No discrimination against blues
c. 1992: OK to discriminate against squares
d. 1996: No discrimination against greens
The lowest-level trial court of Washington, which must now decide whether it is OK to discriminate against reds, may rule that such discrimination against reds is OK.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The fact that discrimination against squares was deemed acceptable in 1992 does not necessarily mean that discrimination against reds would also be deemed acceptable. Each case is decided based on its own unique facts and circumstances. Therefore, the trial court would need to consider the specific issues presented in the case regarding discrimination against reds before making a ruling.

Assume the Supreme Court of Washington State Has Made the Following