Which court case held that a nonconsensual drawing of blood ordinarily requires a warrant other than in emergency circumstances?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Missouri v. McNeely held that a nonconsensual blood draw ordinarily requires a warrant, other than in emergency circumstances, because the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not create a per se exigency that justifies a warrantless blood test. Choices A, C, and D are court cases related to other issues (wrongful death, privacy, and DUI testing of breath and blood, respectively).

Which Court Case Held That a Nonconsensual Drawing of Blood