In McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003), the Supreme Court held that the prohibition of soft money contributions by wealthy donors and interests were unconstitutional limitations on free speech.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003), the Supreme Court upheld the provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002, which prohibited soft money contributions to national political parties and restricted campaign finance practices, affirming these regulations did not violate the First Amendment's free speech protections.

In McConnell V